Former India wicketkeeper Parthiv Patel reportedly decided against applying for the BCCI men’s chief selector position because the annual remuneration of ₹3 crore could have been lower than his combined earnings from coaching and commentary.
The race to become the next chief selector of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has taken an unexpected turn, with former Indian cricketer Parthiv Patel reportedly choosing not to apply for the high-profile position. Despite being considered a strong contender, financial considerations may have influenced his decision.
According to a report by The Telegraph India, Patel stepped away from the selection race because accepting the role could have resulted in a significant financial loss. The reported ₹3 crore annual salary would also have meant giving up other professional opportunities, including his association with Gujarat Titans and his commentary assignments.
Why Did Parthiv Patel Not Apply for the BCCI Chief Selector Job?
Parthiv Patel was reportedly among the leading candidates to replace Ajit Agarkar as the chairman of the BCCI men’s selection committee. His name had been discussed in cricketing circles even before speculation about Agarkar’s future gathered momentum.
However, Patel did not submit his application before the deadline. Reports suggest that the financial implications of the position were a major factor behind his decision.
The chief selector’s job comes with significant responsibilities and restrictions. Taking up the role could require Patel to leave his coaching commitments with Gujarat Titans and give up commentary opportunities, potentially reducing his overall income.
As a result, the reported annual remuneration of ₹3 crore may not have made the position financially attractive enough for him.
Parthiv Patel’s Cricket Career and Coaching Experience
Parthiv Patel represented India across all three major international formats during his playing career. He played 25 Test matches, 38 One Day Internationals and two T20 Internationals.
After retiring from international cricket, Patel continued to remain involved in the game through coaching and media work. His professional experience and understanding of Indian cricket reportedly made him a strong candidate for the chief selector position.
However, the restrictions associated with the role could require a major professional and financial adjustment.
Pragyan Ojha Emerges as a Contender for the Selection Committee
With Patel reportedly out of the race, attention has shifted towards other potential candidates for the BCCI selection committee.
South Zone selector Pragyan Ojha has emerged as a possible option for the chief selector’s position. Reports have also suggested that former cricketers Wasim Jaffer and Romesh Powar are among the names being considered.
The BCCI is also looking to fill the remaining vacancy on its men’s selection committee, including the position expected to be filled by a representative from the West Zone.
The final decision will depend on the board’s selection process and the availability of suitable candidates.
R Ashwin Questions the Salary Offered to BCCI Selectors
Former India spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has raised concerns about whether the remuneration offered to selectors is sufficient to attract highly experienced former cricketers.
Speaking on his YouTube channel, Ashwin argued that the chairman of selectors should receive compensation comparable to that of the Indian men’s head coach if the BCCI wants candidates with exceptional cricketing credentials.
Ashwin pointed out that selectors face several professional restrictions. They are expected to follow domestic first-class cricket, monitor the Indian Premier League (IPL), assess players regularly and remain closely involved with the game throughout the year.
At the same time, they may have to give up other income sources, including media assignments and coaching opportunities, because of potential conflicts of interest.
According to Ashwin, these restrictions make the role demanding, both professionally and financially.
He suggested that better remuneration could encourage former international stars such as Sourav Ganguly, Rahul Dravid and Anil Kumble to consider selection-related responsibilities.
Should the BCCI Increase the Chief Selector’s Salary?
The reported Parthiv Patel development has brought renewed attention to the financial structure of the BCCI selection committee.
While the chief selector’s position carries considerable responsibility and influence, the restrictions on outside professional activities can make it less attractive to former players who have established careers in coaching, broadcasting and other cricket-related fields.
A more competitive salary could help the BCCI attract experienced candidates who possess strong cricketing knowledge and the ability to evaluate talent across different formats.
However, remuneration is only one factor. The role also requires consistent performance analysis, independent decision-making and a long-term commitment to Indian cricket.
Conclusion
Parthiv Patel’s reported decision not to apply for the BCCI chief selector role has raised an important question about whether the current remuneration is competitive enough to attract top former cricketers.
Although the reported ₹3 crore annual package appears substantial, giving up coaching and commentary opportunities could significantly affect a candidate’s overall earnings.
As the BCCI considers its options, the debate over selector salaries and professional restrictions is likely to remain an important part of the discussion surrounding India’s cricket selection system.
Note: The reasons behind Patel’s reported decision and the potential candidates mentioned above are based on media reports. The BCCI’s final appointment and any official confirmation should be checked against the board’s latest announcements.
